|
It must have been incredibly hard getting water from the pump, I mean, it has to be said that running water was a real revolution but, like everything else, routine turns it into alienation. Its the same with all our relations, which end up lobotomising us in small doses. Since I rather tend to resist the categorical tap system, very often I merely react to the context because I suspect all this plumbing is building up pressure in a single direction out of a concern for efficiency and according to principles of unilateral, basic functionality. I tend to think that a tap is only likeable when it splashes ! I distrust electricity, painting or mediated humanitarianism ! Naturally, I need to correct this. But to react to the blackmail of the beam of ordered and specialised directional logic, I try to redirect the jets and upset the apparent obviousness of a movement that would seem to flow self-evidently from source.
|
So I experiment with all kinds of things so as to block the pipes and see where else it might spurt out, and I always want to reassemble the plumbing back to front, tending to look for flow in places where it shouldnt be moving because I get the impression that things must always be happening elsewhere and elsewhere, and its quite possible that this may be here or there and so I dont know a damned thing - I can test and con-test the canalisations. Its true that such an attitude doesnt help the linearity of the thing ! Still, I think that theres nothing hermetic or complex about my tortuous movements but that they are fairly blatant because its more a kind of existential and transitory meta-ball of wool that is super-monstrously fluid in its auto-chaoticization and whose trajectory develops only in continuous and contiguous formation by blocks of knots, as opposed to all those depressing directionalities that all these people want to inflict on us, offering some pretty staggering justifications under cover of truth, wisdom, or at least of some stupid concept of coherence ! Because this standardised coherence which is brandished to establish the proof of proper process is nothing but a reassuring illusion, a trick ! I would like to blow up this kind of procedure that seems to point straight to the target because I cant make myself respect this idea of roadsigns, this famous «home-grown common sense», by following this bloody, lusted-for light like a mutt with the desire and the pretension of unravelling things in a way that would imply a kind of certainty between paradigm and suprematism ! The sublimated hyper-target, the ultimate carrot is clearly determined as the absolute end of the process ! Truth is that way, no, this way ! Jesus ! I really do want to fight that kind of madness and I am ready to throw myself into that uncomfortable pulverisation. I am ready to float in mental errancy and anguishing, vertiginous dissemination, even if I have to bury myself in an unbearable chaos ! So theres no way I am going to gawp in amazement at a system based on the principle of convictions. I reject that kind of crap which is crawling all over our everyday social, economic and political reality and that in the art world you zoom onto in simulations that are sometimes epic, sometimes insignificant. I have no special bag when it comes to plastic or aesthetic modes - on the contrary, I am conscientiously and extremely fickle to perfection and contradictorily capable of accepting vice versa and head-to-tail the dissolution of my actions and the scattering of my most incompatible gestures in the mixing, remixing and re-remixing of the mixture of the mixed mixture. I am not a Teflon artist and even if it sticks to the bottom I try to be incredibly slippery, dispersed, dismenbered, fragmented. I am very apprehensive but I want to be as permeable as possible the better to surprise myself, destabilise myself and try to act uncontainedly by planning and calculating as little as possible so as to randomly feel the greatest unpredictability in each of the experiences under the nose of the dominant flabbergasted language.
|
Because I have always tried to radically delegate a certain
number of volatile postures, it would seem that my epidemic work regulary
reflects this attitude of mixing, contamination, exchange, linkage and
ineractivity, especially when, for example, I make bread at a bakery or
invite the public to eat my work or when I invite a professional clown
to come and present my pieces in my stead at the private view of my show,
when I organise a students-vs.-riot police soccer match or a pop High
Mass in a boxing ring, when I invite a scientist to come and give a lecture
on nuclear physics on a boat, using the sail as a paperboard, when I put
on an action on the Cherbourg-Paris turbo train, handing out copies and
colour pencils to all the travellers so they can play at railway beggar-my-neighbour
with their seatmate, or when I invite my whole family to indulge in its
favourite hobby in public, or when I have myself an electro-encephalogram
at the psychiatric hospital and present it to the customers of a hair
salon while shaving a girl live, when I open and for seven years run the
«Nouveau Mixage» artists space, when I set up a rock
group with false musicians to try and play in the hottest nightspots in
Paris and London in a parody of the star system, when I become world champion
camembert thrower in the middle of the Paris streets and thus get into
the Guinness Book of Records, when with a friend I organise a plein-air
painting competition mixing fifty contemporary artists with fifty naff
Sunday painters, when, disguised as a fortune teller at an exhibition,
I read the cards for people, when I make a choral video, inviting neighbours
and fellow villagers to come and sing in my studio in front of a static
camera, when I present a sculpture, «The Gene of the Atheist Cross
for Clay Sculpture» with twelve gas cookers and twelve whistling
kettles so as to provide tea for the public all through the exhibition,
when at the Nantes C.R.D.C I presente the «Bo-Û Exchanger-Changer»,
summoning thirty-odd artists to come and squat my solo show so that they
can graft themselves and prosthesise directly onto my own pieces, which
they can add to, when I organise the HIATUS café, when I make a
sado-masochistic billard table for bars or when I make monochrome object
sites with the help of the local population, which I enjoin via adverts
in the papers and on local radio, when I offer to make a gutter 1,8 kilometres
long made of 25000 glass containers, corresponding to the 25000 inhabitants
and suggest that each person appropriate one container in this transparent
line that runs through the whole town, by inviting artists to dance with
me or by creating one-colour-only sale or return shops or, currently,
by making «cyba-cloms» with local people, etc. I have the
impression that I have often proposed interfacing contraptions the better
to be open, available and attentive, ready to try new combinations, other
modifiable and proliferating articulations, I have cobbed together quite
a lot of configurations to try to trigger other desires and make more
or less successful attempts at other modes of exchange. All these various
ongoing experiences constitute, it seems to me, the equivalent of an intermediary
presence that comes quite close to this idea of proximity and possibly
micropolitical links, trying always to share differently, to enter into
a relation as between fish and fowl with sometimes surprising and incongruous
effects that may be highly enriching or completely useless à la
«say hello to the microphone... hello microphone !» - and
most of all so as not to play the political pimp.
|